This Saturday Rosas Jr. vs Barcelos · Meta APEX Las Vegas, NV United States See this week's picks →
Events · Silva vs Delgado ·

Waldo Cortes Acosta vs Curtis Blaydes

Red corner Waldo CortesAcosta“Salsa Boy”Ultimate Kombat Fitness · Fundacion, Barahona
VSSettled
Blue corner CurtisBlaydes“Razor”Elevation Fight Team · Naperville, Illinois
Heavyweight3 rounds12 Sep 2026At the time: #5 Heavyweight vs #6 · rankings of 8 September 2026
The story going in
  • Has finished 5 of 10 UFC wins.
  • Has finished 8 of 14 UFC wins.
  • Carries 38 points more takedown defence than Blaydes.
  • 21 UFC bouts deep — 8 more than Acosta.
−1 yr34
Age
35
6' 4"
Height
6' 4"
78″
Reach
+2″80″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
13
UFC bouts
+821
5/1050% of wins
Finishes
+7%8/1457% of wins
Ultimate Kombat Fitness
Gym
Elevation Fight Team
Fundacion, Barahona
From
Naperville, Illinois
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

The call vs the fight

What we published before the card, next to what happened in the cage.

Our call
Waldo Cortes Acosta
64.7% confidentMED
Method calledKO/TKO 50%
Vs the market+1.2pp
Market had our pick at64%
The fight
Curtis Blaydes
LOSS
How it endedDEC
Round3 of 3
Clock5:00
Missed We called Waldo Cortes Acosta at 64.7%Curtis Blaydes won. The method call missed as well.
Graded against the official UFC result, from the same record every other page on this site is graded from. The tick beside the verdict is the method call — a correct winner with a wrong method is a partial hit and reads as one. See the full public record →

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Waldo Cortes Acosta7 sig landed
HEAD71%5 of 20BODY0%0 landedLEGS29%2 of 3
Curtis Blaydes7 sig landed
HEAD14%1 of 20BODY29%2 of 2LEGS57%4 of 5
7 of 23
Sig.
strikes
7 of 27
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 3
0:00
Control
1:13
Distance 7Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 6Clinch 0Ground 1
Judges · this round · Acosta firstMichael Bell9–10Eric Colón9–10Andrew Topps10–9
Round 25:00 of action
Waldo Cortes Acosta9 sig landed
HEAD78%7 of 34BODY0%0 landedLEGS22%2 of 2
Curtis Blaydes9 sig landed
HEAD33%3 of 18BODY11%1 of 1LEGS56%5 of 5
9 of 36
Sig.
strikes
9 of 24
0 of 0
Take-
downs
2 of 3
0:00
Control
1:27
Distance 9Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 9Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Acosta firstMichael Bell10–9Eric Colón9–10Andrew Topps9–10
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
Waldo Cortes Acosta12 sig landed
HEAD75%9 of 33BODY0%0 landedLEGS25%3 of 3
Curtis Blaydes8 sig landed
HEAD12%1 of 12BODY12%1 of 2LEGS75%6 of 9
12 of 36
Sig.
strikes
8 of 23
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 4
0:00
Control
0:58
Distance 12Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 8Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Acosta firstMichael Bell9–10Eric Colón10–9Andrew Topps9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Dan Miragliotta
Waldo Cortes AcostaCurtis Blaydes
Official totals — Waldo Cortes Acosta first
JudgeTotal
Michael Bell28–29
Eric Colón2.0 avg spread · 42% wide28–29
Andrew Topps28–29

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 9 scored, Waldo Cortes Acosta first · unofficial

Unattributed27–30
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com27–30
CombatPress.com27–30
Danny Segura MMAJunkie.com28–29
Tyler Treese Sherdog.com28–29
Brian Knapp Sherdog.com28–29
Tudor Leonte Sherdog.com28–29
MMAMania.com28–29
Dayne Fox Sherdog.com28–29

Fan vote · unofficial

30-27 Blaydes · 38%29-28 Blaydes · 32%29-28 Cortes-Acosta · 19%30-27 Cortes-Acosta · 8%

37 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Waldo Cortes Acosta

0.40takedowns / 15 min
0.40 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
5.12 / 15m
0.80 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
10.89 / 15m
50%
ACCURACY
47%
0.10 / 15m
SUB ATT
0.00 / 15m

Curtis Blaydes

5.12takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (6.29 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked in Heavyweight

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Waldo Cortes Acosta↑ +9.0pp
open 54.3%close 63.3%
Curtis Blaydes↓ −9.0pp
open 45.7%close 36.7%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

Waldo Cortes Acosta opened at 54.3% and closed at 63.3% (+9.0pp), with Curtis Blaydes moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Our published call had Waldo Cortes Acosta at 64.7%. At the closing consensus, the de-vigged market had the same fighter at 63.3% — our number sat 1.4pp above the market’s. Two numbers, side by side. How our calls have actually done is the public record, not one bout.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Waldo Cortes Acosta-130-19754.3%63.3%+9.0pp
Curtis Blaydes11016045.7%36.7%−9.0pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · dated 2026-09-13 on the odds record (1d from the card date; the nearest day inside a two-day window is used, never a guess) · scraped 2026-09-20. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Back to the public record