This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
History · 2024 · UFC 304: Edwards vs. Muhammad 2 · Nathaniel Wood vs Daniel Pineda
From the tape · 27 Jul 2024

Nathaniel Wood vs Daniel Pineda

UFC 304: Edwards vs. Muhammad 2 · Manchester, England, United Kingdom
Result

Nathaniel Wood beat Daniel Pineda

Method
Decision - Unanimous
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
FeatherweightMain cardReferee · Mike Beltran

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

Red corner NathanielWood“The Prospect”Great Britain Top Team · London
VSOn the tape
DP
Blue corner DanielPineda“The Pit”4oz. Fight Club · Houston, Texas
Featherweight3 rounds27 Jul 2024
The story going in
  • Has finished 3 of 7 UFC wins.
  • Every one of Pineda’s 5 UFC wins came inside the distance.
  • Lands 2.8 more significant strikes a minute than Pineda.
23-6
Record
28-17
−7 yr31
Age
38
5' 6"
Height
+1″5' 7"
69″
Reach
69″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
10
UFC bouts
+212
3/743% of wins
Finishes
+57%5/5100% of wins
Great Britain Top Team
Gym
4oz. Fight Club
London
From
Houston, Texas
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Nathaniel Wood15 sig landed
HEAD53%8 of 14BODY20%3 of 3LEGS27%4 of 4
Daniel Pineda13 sig landed
HEAD77%10 of 14BODY0%0 of 1LEGS23%3 of 3
15 of 21
Sig.
strikes
13 of 18
0 of 0
Take-
downs
0 of 2
2:09
Control
1:47
0
Knock-
downs
0
0
Sub
attempts
0
Distance 11Clinch 0Ground 4
Where it
happened
Distance 4Clinch 0Ground 9
Judges · this round · Wood firstDavid Lethaby10–9Darryl Ransom10–9Clemens Werner10–9
Round 25:00 of action⚡ 1 KD Wood
Nathaniel Wood42 sig landed
HEAD52%22 of 37BODY19%8 of 9LEGS29%12 of 15
Daniel Pineda12 sig landed
HEAD42%5 of 26BODY17%2 of 3LEGS42%5 of 7
42 of 61
Sig.
strikes
12 of 36
0 of 0
Take-
downs
0 of 3
1:22
Control
0:04
1
Knock-
downs
0
0
Sub
attempts
0
Distance 35Clinch 0Ground 7
Where it
happened
Distance 11Clinch 1Ground 0
Judges · this round · Wood firstDavid Lethaby10–8Darryl Ransom10–8Clemens Werner10–9
Round 35:00 of action1 sub attemptEnded 5:00
Nathaniel Wood9 sig landed
HEAD56%5 of 5BODY11%1 of 2LEGS33%3 of 4
Daniel Pineda7 sig landed
HEAD86%6 of 13BODY14%1 of 1LEGS0%0 of 1
9 of 11
Sig.
strikes
7 of 15
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 1
0:11
Control
3:41
0
Knock-
downs
0
1
Sub
attempts
0
Distance 9Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 4Clinch 1Ground 2
Judges · this round · Wood firstDavid Lethaby9–10Darryl Ransom9–10Clemens Werner9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Mike Beltran
Nathaniel WoodDaniel Pineda
Official totals — Nathaniel Wood first
JudgeTotal
David Lethaby2.1 avg spread · 44% wide29–27
Darryl Ransom2.2 avg spread · 55% wide29–27
Clemens Werner2.1 avg spread · 50% wide29–28

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 12 scored, Nathaniel Wood first · unofficial

Dayne Fox The MMA Draw29–27
Matthew Wells MMAJunkie.com29–27
Jay Pettry Sherdog.com29–27
Scottie Smith Sherdog.com29–27
Paul Fontaine WrestlingObserver.com29–28
Jake Noecker Cageside Press29–28
Daniel Yanofsky The Sporting News29–28
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com29–28
Combat Press.com29–28
Zane Simon The MMA Vivisection29–28
Devin Tejada Sherdog.com29–28
Keith Shillan Sherdog.com28–28

Fan vote · unofficial

29-27 Wood · 62%29-28 Wood · 17%29-28 Pineda · 12%

42 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Nathaniel Wood

1.35takedowns / 15 min
1.35 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
1.42 / 15m
2.81 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
5.92 / 15m
48%
ACCURACY
24%
0.50 / 15m
SUB ATT
1.50 / 15m

Daniel Pineda

1.42takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.73 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked in Featherweight

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Nathaniel Wood↑ +5.9pp
open 72.6%close 78.4%
Daniel Pineda↓ −5.9pp
open 27.4%close 21.6%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

Nathaniel Wood opened at 72.6% and closed at 78.4% (+5.9pp), with Daniel Pineda moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Nathaniel Wood-350-44572.6%78.4%+5.9pp
Daniel Pineda24034527.4%21.6%−5.9pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · dated 2024-07-28 on the odds record (1d from the card date; the nearest day inside a two-day window is used, never a guess) · scraped 2026-06-10. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record