This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
History · 2022 · UFC Fight Night: Blachowicz vs. Rakic · Jake Hadley vs Allan Nascimento
From the tape · 14 May 2022

Jake Hadley vs Allan Nascimento

UFC Fight Night: Blachowicz vs. Rakic · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Result

Allan Nascimento beat Jake Hadley

Method
Decision - Unanimous
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
FlyweightMain cardReferee · Mike Beltran

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

Red corner JakeHadley“White Kong”Fearless MMA · Birmingham, West Midlands
VSOn the tape
Blue corner AllanNascimento“Puro Osso”Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo
Flyweight3 rounds14 May 2022
The story going in
  • Carries 17 points more takedown defence than Nascimento.
  • Is 12 points more accurate striking than Hadley.
11-4
Record
22-7
−5 yr25
Age
30
5' 7"
Height
+1″5' 8"
+1″70″
Reach
69″
Southpaw
Stance
Orthodox
Birmingham, West Midlands
From
Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Jake Hadley3 sig landed
HEAD33%1 of 11BODY67%2 of 3LEGS0%0 landed
Allan Nascimento4 sig landed
HEAD25%1 of 6BODY25%1 of 3LEGS50%2 of 2
3 of 14
Sig.
strikes
4 of 11
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 1
1:23
Control
2:59
0
Sub
attempts
0
Distance 1Clinch 0Ground 2
Where it
happened
Distance 3Clinch 0Ground 1
Judges · this round · Hadley firstAdalaide Byrd9–10Sal D'Amato9–10Ron McCarthy9–10
Round 25:00 of action
Jake Hadley2 sig landed
HEAD50%1 of 4BODY50%1 of 1LEGS0%0 landed
Allan Nascimento9 sig landed
HEAD33%3 of 11BODY56%5 of 9LEGS11%1 of 1
2 of 5
Sig.
strikes
9 of 21
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 1
0:25
Control
4:04
0
Sub
attempts
0
Distance 1Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 4Clinch 1Ground 4
Judges · this round · Hadley firstAdalaide Byrd9–10Sal D'Amato9–10Ron McCarthy9–10
Round 35:00 of action1 sub attemptEnded 5:00
Jake Hadley3 sig landed
HEAD100%3 of 10BODY0%0 landedLEGS0%0 landed
Allan Nascimento6 sig landed
HEAD50%3 of 15BODY33%2 of 4LEGS17%1 of 1
3 of 10
Sig.
strikes
6 of 20
0 of 0
Take-
downs
0 of 2
2:02
Control
2:24
1
Sub
attempts
0
Distance 1Clinch 0Ground 2
Where it
happened
Distance 3Clinch 0Ground 3
Judges · this round · Hadley firstAdalaide Byrd9–10Sal D'Amato9–10Ron McCarthy9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Mike Beltran
Jake HadleyAllan Nascimento
Official totals — Jake Hadley first
JudgeTotal
Adalaide Byrd2.0 avg spread · 45% wide27–30
Sal D'Amato2.1 avg spread · 46% wide27–30
Ron McCarthy2.0 avg spread · 41% wide27–30

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 15 scored, Jake Hadley first · unofficial

Dayne Fox BloodyElbow.com27–30
Marcel Dorff Eurosport Nederland27–30
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com27–30
Matthew Wells MMAJunkie.com27–30
Dan Levi Best Fight Picks27–30
Combat Press.com27–30
Keith Shillan Sherdog.com27–30
Drake Riggs MMAMania.com27–30
Sheehan SevereMMA.com27–30
Steve Duncan mma.uno27–30
Ben Duffy Sherdog.com27–30
Tristen Critchfield Sherdog.com27–30
Tyler Treese Sherdog.com27–30
MM AJunkie.com27–30
MM AMania.com27–30

Fan vote · unofficial

30-27 Nascimento · 92%29-28 Nascimento · 8%

24 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Jake Hadley

0.33takedowns / 15 min
0.33 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
1.26 / 15m
3.00 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
5.48 / 15m
11%
ACCURACY
23%
1.10 / 15m
SUB ATT
1.10 / 15m

Allan Nascimento

1.26takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.32 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked roster-wide

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Jake Hadley↓ −7.3pp
open 72.4%close 65.1%
Allan Nascimento↑ +7.3pp
open 27.6%close 34.9%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

Jake Hadley opened at 72.4% and closed at 65.1% (−7.3pp), with Allan Nascimento moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Jake Hadley-300-21272.4%65.1%−7.3pp
Allan Nascimento25017527.6%34.9%+7.3pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · scraped 2026-06-10. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record