This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
History · 2021 · UFC Fight Night: Vettori vs. Holland · Da Woon Jung vs William Knight
From the tape · 10 Apr 2021

Da Woon Jung vs William Knight

UFC Fight Night: Vettori vs. Holland · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Result

Da Woon Jung beat William Knight

Method
Decision - Unanimous
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
Light HeavyweightMain cardReferee · Mark Smith

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

Red corner Da WoonJungKorean Top Team · Daegu
VSOn the tape
Blue corner WilliamKnight“Knightmare”Thornton Martial Arts · Hartford, Connecticut
Light Heavyweight3 rounds10 Apr 2021
The story going in
  • Carries 27 points more takedown defence than Knight.
  • Is 16 points more accurate striking than Jung.
15-6-1
Record
11-5
−6 yr27
Age
33
+6″6' 4"
Height
5' 10"
+5″78″
Reach
73″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
+23
UFC bouts
1
2/2100% of wins
Finishes
0/10% of wins
Korean Top Team
Gym
Thornton Martial Arts
Daegu
From
Hartford, Connecticut
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Da Woon Jung4 sig landed
HEAD25%1 of 4BODY0%0 of 1LEGS75%3 of 3
William Knight6 sig landed
HEAD0%0 of 2BODY0%0 landedLEGS100%6 of 10
4 of 8
Sig.
strikes
6 of 12
2 of 3
Take-
downs
0 of 2
3:26
Control
0:08
Distance 3Clinch 0Ground 1
Where it
happened
Distance 6Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Jung firstSal D'Amato10–9Tony Weeks10–9Rick Winter10–9
Round 25:00 of action
Da Woon Jung24 sig landed
HEAD79%19 of 32BODY0%0 landedLEGS21%5 of 5
William Knight9 sig landed
HEAD33%3 of 6BODY11%1 of 1LEGS56%5 of 5
24 of 37
Sig.
strikes
9 of 12
3 of 3
Take-
downs
0 of 1
3:56
Control
0:00
Distance 8Clinch 0Ground 16
Where it
happened
Distance 9Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Jung firstSal D'Amato10–8Tony Weeks10–9Rick Winter10–8
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
Da Woon Jung0 sig landed
HEAD0%0 of 1BODY0%0 landedLEGS0%0 landed

No significant strikes landed — 1 thrown

William Knight2 sig landed
HEAD100%2 of 5BODY0%0 landedLEGS0%0 landed
0 of 1
Sig.
strikes
2 of 5
3 of 3
Take-
downs
0 of 0
4:42
Control
0:01
Distance 0Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 2Clinch 0Ground 0
Judges · this round · Jung firstSal D'Amato10–9Tony Weeks10–9Rick Winter10–9

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Mark Smith
Da Woon JungWilliam Knight
Official totals — Da Woon Jung first
JudgeTotal
Sal D'Amato2.1 avg spread · 46% wide30–26
Tony Weeks2.1 avg spread · 49% wide30–27
Rick Winter2.1 avg spread · 51% wide30–26

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 15 scored, Da Woon Jung first · unofficial

Dayne Fox BloodyElbow.com30–25
Marcel Dorff mmadna.nl30–25
Shawn Bitter Cageside Press30–25
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com30–25
Paul Fontaine WrestlingObserver.com30–26
Steve Duncan mma.uno30–26
Jillian DeCoursey CombatPress.com30–26
Keith Shillan Sherdog.com30–26
Joe McDonagh Cageside Press30–26
Rob Tatum CombatPress.com30–26
Jay Pettry Sherdog.com30–26
Tristen Critchfield Sherdog.com30–26
Tyler Treese Sherdog.com30–26
MM AMania.com30–26
MM AJunkie.com30–27

Fan vote · unofficial

30-26 Jung · 50%30-25 Jung · 36%30-27 Jung · 11%30-27 Knight · 4%

28 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Da Woon Jung

1.59takedowns / 15 min
1.59 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
1.78 / 15m
3.38 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
4.45 / 15m
47%
ACCURACY
40%
0.20 / 15m
SUB ATT
0.40 / 15m

William Knight

1.78takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.32 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked roster-wide

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Da Woon Jungclose only
no opening line on recordclose 56.1%
William Knightclose only
no opening line on recordclose 43.9%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

We hold the closing consensus for this bout but no opening line, so the strip marks the close alone: Da Woon Jung 56.1%, William Knight 43.9%, vig removed.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Da Woon Jung-14256.1%
William Knight-11011843.9%
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · scraped 2026-06-10 · BestFightOdds has no fighter page scraped for Da Un Jung, so that corner’s CLOSE is read from the opponent’s row, which names it explicitly. No opening line exists for that corner and none is shown.. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record