This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
History · 2019 · UFC Fight Night: Blachowicz vs. Jacare · Vanessa Melo vs Tracy Cortez
From the tape · 16 Nov 2019

Vanessa Melo vs Tracy Cortez

UFC Fight Night: Blachowicz vs. Jacare · Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
Result

Tracy Cortez beat Vanessa Melo

Method
Decision - Unanimous
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
Women's BantamweightMain cardReferee · Jerin Valel

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

VM
Red corner VanessaMeloSao Paulo, Sao Paulo
VSOn the tape
Blue corner TracyCortezFight Ready · Phoenix, Arizona
Women's Bantamweight3 rounds16 Nov 2019
The story going in
  • Carries 12 points more takedown defence than Cortez.
  • Is 18 points more accurate striking than Melo.
11-8
Record
12-4
31
Age
−6 yr25
5' 5"
Height
5' 5"
65″
Reach
65″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo
From
Phoenix, Arizona
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Vanessa Melo21 sig landed
HEAD95%20 of 86BODY5%1 of 1LEGS0%0 landed
Tracy Cortez41 sig landed
HEAD73%30 of 66BODY15%6 of 8LEGS12%5 of 8
21 of 87
Sig.
strikes
41 of 82
0 of 0
Take-
downs
0 of 1
0:00
Control
0:00
Distance 21Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 40Clinch 1Ground 0
Judges · this round · Melo firstSal D'Amato9–10Hallison Pontes10–9Marcelo Vilhena9–10
Round 25:00 of action
Vanessa Melo6 sig landed
HEAD17%1 of 4BODY83%5 of 5LEGS0%0 landed
Tracy Cortez11 sig landed
HEAD27%3 of 6BODY55%6 of 6LEGS18%2 of 2
6 of 9
Sig.
strikes
11 of 14
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 7
0:02
Control
4:43
Distance 0Clinch 6Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 0Clinch 11Ground 0
Judges · this round · Melo firstSal D'Amato9–10Hallison Pontes9–10Marcelo Vilhena9–10
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
Vanessa Melo13 sig landed
HEAD85%11 of 26BODY8%1 of 1LEGS8%1 of 2
Tracy Cortez27 sig landed
HEAD74%20 of 37BODY15%4 of 4LEGS11%3 of 3
13 of 29
Sig.
strikes
27 of 44
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 1
0:00
Control
4:03
Distance 11Clinch 0Ground 2
Where it
happened
Distance 6Clinch 0Ground 21
Judges · this round · Melo firstSal D'Amato9–10Hallison Pontes8–10Marcelo Vilhena9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Jerin Valel
Vanessa MeloTracy Cortez
Official totals — Vanessa Melo first
JudgeTotal
Sal D'Amato2.1 avg spread · 46% wide27–30
Hallison Pontes2.0 avg spread · 40% wide27–29
Marcelo Vilhena27–30

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 14 scored, Vanessa Melo first · unofficial

Keith Shillan Sherdog.com26–30
Drake Riggs TheBodyLockMMA.com26–30
Dominik Durniat Polsat Sport27–30
Steve Duncan mma.uno27–30
Wesley Riddle MMASucka.com27–30
MM ABrasil.com.br27–30
Rob Tatum CombatPress.com27–30
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com27–30
Dayne Fox BloodyElbow.com27–30
Jay Pettry Sherdog.com27–30
MM AJunkie.com27–30
MM AMania.com27–30
Mike Sloan Sherdog.com27–30
Tyler Treese Sherdog.com27–30

Fan vote · unofficial

30-27 Cortez · 69%30-26 Cortez · 23%30-28 Cortez · 8%

13 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Vanessa Melo

0.00takedowns / 15 min
0.00 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
2.15 / 15m
n/a
ATTEMPTS
4.67 / 15m
n/a
ACCURACY
46%
0.00 / 15m
SUB ATT
0.30 / 15m

Tracy Cortez

2.15takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.32 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked roster-wide

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Vanessa Melo↓ −5.3pp
open 38.6%close 33.3%
Tracy Cortez↑ +5.3pp
open 61.4%close 66.7%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

Vanessa Melo opened at 38.6% and closed at 33.3% (−5.3pp), with Tracy Cortez moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Vanessa Melo14518938.6%33.3%−5.3pp
Tracy Cortez-185-22661.4%66.7%+5.3pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · scraped 2026-06-10. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record