Built from Larissa Pacheco’s own numbers — record, form, fighting style and standout rate. Not reported prose. All-rounder
5' 7" orthodox all-rounder campaigning at Women's Bantamweight.
The facts, plainly — vitals and record from public UFC statistics; nickname, nationality, hometown and camp from the public fighter register. A field we can't source stays “pending”; it never shows a fake value.
| Nickname | pending |
| Nationality | Brazil |
| Hometown | Belem, Para |
| Fighting out of | Joao Bastos Team |
| Height | 5' 7" |
| Reach | pending |
| Stance | Orthodox |
| Age | 31 |
| Date of birth | Sep 07, 1994 |
| Weight | 135 lbs. |
| Pro record | 10-2 |
| Finish split | pending |
Career averages over Larissa Pacheco’s UFC bouts, straight from public UFC statistics — the same eight numbers on her official record. These are the source’s figures, not our read: what we make of them is the card below.
Six 0–100 scores, each a percentile rank against the Women's Bantamweight field — not against the whole roster. Tap any i for what a score measures.
Where the strikes go — and where they land on her. Career UFC totals, straight off the tape.
Significant strikes only, as recorded by UFCStats, across the fighter's whole UFC career. Shares are raw counts — nothing here is modelled or smoothed. Accuracy is landed ÷ attempted and comes from the per-round tape, which covers slightly fewer fights than the totals do. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average.
No takedown data
UFCStats records no takedown or submission activity for this fighter in either direction — usually a fighter with no UFC bout on the tape. A row of zeroes would read as a measured weakness; this is an absence, and we show it as one.
Pro record: 10-2. In the UFC: 0-2. Larissa Pacheco’s last 2 UFC bouts, most recent first — the result in the cage, not our pick.
Straight off the official UFC fight record. Card names are left off on purpose: the only event labels in our data are derived, and we’d rather print nothing than print one that’s wrong.