This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
Events · UFC 220: Miocic vs. Ngannou · Dan Ige vs Julio Arce
From the tape · 20 Jan 2018

Dan Ige vs Julio Arce

UFC 220: Miocic vs. Ngannou · Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Result

Julio Arce beat Dan Ige

Method
Decision - Unanimous
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
FeatherweightMain cardReferee · Kevin MacDonald

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

Red corner DanIge“50K”Xtreme Couture · Honolulu, Hawaii
VSOn the tape
Blue corner JulioArceTeam Tiger Schulmann · Queens, New York
Featherweight3 rounds20 Jan 2018
The story going in
  • Is 9 points more accurate striking than Arce.
  • Carries 40 points more takedown defence than Ige.
19-11
Record
19-6
−2 yr26
Age
28
5' 7"
Height
5' 7"
+1″71″
Reach
70″
Orthodox
Stance
Southpaw
Xtreme Couture
Gym
Team Tiger Schulmann
Honolulu, Hawaii
From
Queens, New York
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Dan Ige5 sig landed
HEAD0%0 of 20BODY40%2 of 6LEGS60%3 of 4
Julio Arce23 sig landed
HEAD78%18 of 50BODY17%4 of 4LEGS4%1 of 1
5 of 30
Sig.
strikes
23 of 55
1 of 6
Take-
downs
0 of 0
0:40
Control
0:20
Distance 4Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 17Clinch 4Ground 2
Judges · this round · Ige firstDouglas Crosby9–10Sal D'Amato9–10
Round 25:00 of action
Dan Ige13 sig landed
HEAD62%8 of 28BODY8%1 of 4LEGS31%4 of 6
Julio Arce20 sig landed
HEAD85%17 of 59BODY15%3 of 4LEGS0%0 landed
13 of 38
Sig.
strikes
20 of 63
0 of 5
Take-
downs
0 of 0
0:33
Control
0:15
Distance 13Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 18Clinch 2Ground 0
Judges · this round · Ige firstDouglas Crosby9–10Sal D'Amato9–10
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
Dan Ige17 sig landed
HEAD41%7 of 30BODY18%3 of 7LEGS41%7 of 8
Julio Arce29 sig landed
HEAD86%25 of 75BODY14%4 of 8LEGS0%0 landed
17 of 45
Sig.
strikes
29 of 83
0 of 2
Take-
downs
0 of 0
0:03
Control
0:09
Distance 16Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 26Clinch 2Ground 1
Judges · this round · Ige firstDouglas Crosby9–10Sal D'Amato9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Kevin MacDonald
Dan IgeJulio Arce
Official totals — Dan Ige first
JudgeTotal
Douglas Crosby27–30
Sal D'Amato2.1 avg spread · 46% wide27–30

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 18 scored, Dan Ige first · unofficial

Youngs FanSided.com26–30
MM AJunkie.com27–30
Paul Fontaine WrestlingObserver.com27–30
Josh Nason Wrestling Observer27–30
MM AMania.com27–30
Craig Amos BleacherReport.com27–30
Mookie Alexander BloodyElbow.com27–30
Josh Stillman Sherdog.com27–30
Chris Nelson Sherdog.com27–30
Brian Knapp Sherdog.com27–30
Nolan King MMA- Today.com27–30
Rob Tatum CombatPress.com27–30
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com27–30
Dominik Durniat Extreme Sports Channel27–30
Rafael Oreiro MMABrasil.com.br27–30
Wesley Riddle MMASucka.com27–30
John Pollock POST Wrestling27–30
Steve Duncan mma.uno27–30

Fan vote · unofficial

30-27 Arce · 84%30-26 Arce · 10%29-28 Arce · 5%

19 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Dan Ige

0.93takedowns / 15 min
0.93 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
0.46 / 15m
3.58 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
1.64 / 15m
26%
ACCURACY
28%
0.20 / 15m
SUB ATT
0.30 / 15m

Julio Arce

0.46takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.32 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked roster-wide

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Dan Ige↑ +3.9pp
open 39.3%close 43.2%
Julio Arce↓ −3.9pp
open 60.7%close 56.8%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

Dan Ige opened at 39.3% and closed at 43.2% (+3.9pp), with Julio Arce moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Dan Ige14012339.3%43.2%+3.9pp
Julio Arce-180-14360.7%56.8%−3.9pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · scraped 2026-06-10. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record