This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
Events · UFC 216: Ferguson vs. Lee · Tom Duquesnoy vs Cody Stamann
From the tape · 7 Oct 2017

Tom Duquesnoy vs Cody Stamann

UFC 216: Ferguson vs. Lee · Las Vegas, Nevada, USA
Result

Cody Stamann beat Tom Duquesnoy

Method
Decision - Split
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
BantamweightMain cardReferee · Chris Tognoni

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

TD
Red corner TomDuquesnoy“Fire Kid”Jackson-Wink MMA · Paris
VSOn the tape
Blue corner CodyStamann“The Spartan”Xtreme Couture · Wayne, Michigan
Bantamweight3 rounds7 Oct 2017
16-2
Record
21-8-1
−3 yr24
Age
27
+1″5' 7"
Height
5' 6"
+4″68″
Reach
64″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
1
UFC bouts
1
1/1100% of wins
Finishes
0/10% of wins
Jackson-Wink MMA
Gym
Xtreme Couture
Paris
From
Wayne, Michigan
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them, and how the three judges scored that round.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
Tom Duquesnoy18 sig landed
HEAD56%10 of 40BODY28%5 of 9LEGS17%3 of 3
Cody Stamann21 sig landed
HEAD48%10 of 44BODY38%8 of 12LEGS14%3 of 9
18 of 52
Sig.
strikes
21 of 65
0 of 0
Take-
downs
2 of 3
0:01
Control
0:44
Distance 17Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 19Clinch 2Ground 0
Judges · this round · Duquesnoy firstChris Lee10–9Marcos Rosales9–10Rick Winter10–9
Round 25:00 of action
Tom Duquesnoy8 sig landed
HEAD88%7 of 23BODY12%1 of 1LEGS0%0 of 1
Cody Stamann26 sig landed
HEAD58%15 of 32BODY31%8 of 10LEGS12%3 of 3
8 of 25
Sig.
strikes
26 of 45
0 of 0
Take-
downs
2 of 2
0:01
Control
2:06
Distance 7Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 16Clinch 5Ground 5
Judges · this round · Duquesnoy firstChris Lee10–9Marcos Rosales9–10Rick Winter9–10
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
Tom Duquesnoy7 sig landed
HEAD71%5 of 18BODY29%2 of 3LEGS0%0 landed
Cody Stamann19 sig landed
HEAD42%8 of 42BODY16%3 of 6LEGS42%8 of 10
7 of 21
Sig.
strikes
19 of 58
1 of 1
Take-
downs
0 of 0
0:15
Control
0:00
Distance 7Clinch 0Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 18Clinch 1Ground 0
Judges · this round · Duquesnoy firstChris Lee9–10Marcos Rosales9–10Rick Winter9–10

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

The cards, totalled

The judges’ final totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score. Their round-by-round 10–9s are with the rounds above.

Official card

Split Decision

Referee · Chris Tognoni
Tom DuquesnoyCody Stamann
Official totals — Tom Duquesnoy first
JudgeTotal
Chris Lee2.0 avg spread · 44% wide29–28
Marcos Rosales2.2 avg spread · 51% wide27–30
Rick Winter2.1 avg spread · 51% wide28–29

Each judge’s round-by-round scores sit with the round they belong to, in the round-by-round section above — switch a round there and the three cards for it change with the stats.

Media cards — 13 scored, Tom Duquesnoy first · unofficial

Jim Edwards MMALatestNews.com28–29
Tim Burke BloodyElbow.com28–29
Ryan Frederick WrestlingObserver.com28–29
John Pollock Fight Network28–29
Rafael Oreiro MMABrasil.com.br28–29
Phil Murphy ESPN28–29
MM AJunkie.com28–29
Tristen Critchfield Sherdog.com28–29
Brian Knapp Sherdog.com28–29
Chris Nelson Sherdog.com28–29
Craig Amos BleacherReport.com28–29
MM AMania.com28–29
Sheehan SevereMMA.com29–28

Fan vote · unofficial

29-28 Stamann · 70%29-28 Duquesnoy · 17%30-27 Stamann · 9%30-28 Stamann · 2%

46 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

Tom Duquesnoy

0.42takedowns / 15 min
0.42 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
2.17 / 15m
1.68 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
5.86 / 15m
25%
ACCURACY
37%
0.00 / 15m
SUB ATT
0.00 / 15m

Cody Stamann

2.17takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (5.45 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked in Bantamweight

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

Tom Duquesnoy↑ +3.2pp
open 55.8%close 59.0%
Cody Stamann↓ −3.2pp
open 44.2%close 41.0%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

Tom Duquesnoy opened at 55.8% and closed at 59.0% (+3.2pp), with Cody Stamann moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
Tom Duquesnoy-150-15655.8%59.0%+3.2pp
Cody Stamann11013644.2%41.0%−3.2pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · scraped 2026-06-10. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record