This Saturday Hooker vs Parnasse · Accor Arena Paris France See this week's picks →
Events · UFC 120: Bisping vs Akiyama · James Wilks vs Claude Patrick
From the tape · 16 Oct 2010

James Wilks vs Claude Patrick

UFC 120: Bisping vs Akiyama · London, England, United Kingdom
Result

Claude Patrick beat James Wilks

Method
Decision - Unanimous
Round
3 of 3
Clock
5:00
WelterweightMain cardReferee · Dan Miragliotta

We published no prediction for this bout. Everything on this page is the official record and the tape it was fought on — the result, the round-by-round counts, the judges’ cards where they exist and the sportsbook line where one was published. Our graded calls start in 2026 and live on the public record.

JW
Red corner JamesWilks“Lightning”Lightning MMA · Leicestershire, East Midlands
VSOn the tape
CP
Blue corner ClaudePatrick“The Prince”Elite Mixed Fighters · Mississauga, Ontario
Welterweight3 rounds16 Oct 2010
7-4
Record
14-2
32
Age
−2 yr30
+2″6' 1"
Height
5' 11"
75″
Reach
75″
Orthodox
Stance
Orthodox
+23
UFC bouts
1
1/250% of wins
Finishes
1/1100% of wins
Lightning MMA
Gym
Elite Mixed Fighters
Leicestershire, East Midlands
From
Mississauga, Ontario
Vitals, record, nickname and camp come from the public UFC fighter register and are current, not a snapshot of fight night. UFC bouts, finish rate and every storyline line are counted off the official UFC fight record. A tick marks the side holding the raw edge in that row — longer reach, taller, younger, more bouts, a higher finish rate. It is a fact about the tape, not a prediction, and rows with no clean comparison (record, stance, gym, hometown) carry no tick at all. Any row we cannot fill on both sides is left out rather than half-drawn. Streaks, bout counts and finish rates are as they stood going into this fight — this bout and everything after it is excluded from the count.

Round by round

Every round the fight went, shaded by where the significant strikes actually landed — and the takedowns, control time and knockdowns beside them.

UFCStats · per round

3 rounds of tape

Round 15:00 of action
James Wilks5 sig landed
HEAD40%2 of 6BODY40%2 of 2LEGS20%1 of 2
Claude Patrick11 sig landed
HEAD73%8 of 16BODY9%1 of 1LEGS18%2 of 2
5 of 10
Sig.
strikes
11 of 19
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 2
0:00
Control
4:14
Distance 2Clinch 3Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 1Clinch 0Ground 10
JudgesNo per-round card for this bout in our decisions source — the judges’ totals are in the scorecards section below.
Round 25:00 of action
James Wilks6 sig landed
HEAD17%1 of 5BODY33%2 of 4LEGS50%3 of 3
Claude Patrick4 sig landed
HEAD50%2 of 4BODY25%1 of 1LEGS25%1 of 1
6 of 12
Sig.
strikes
4 of 6
0 of 1
Take-
downs
1 of 2
0:33
Control
3:54
Distance 1Clinch 5Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 2Clinch 2Ground 0
JudgesNo per-round card for this bout in our decisions source — the judges’ totals are in the scorecards section below.
Round 35:00 of actionEnded 5:00
James Wilks1 sig landed
HEAD0%0 of 3BODY0%0 of 1LEGS100%1 of 2
Claude Patrick8 sig landed
HEAD88%7 of 12BODY12%1 of 3LEGS0%0 landed
1 of 6
Sig.
strikes
8 of 15
0 of 0
Take-
downs
1 of 1
0:15
Control
4:22
Distance 0Clinch 1Ground 0
Where it
happened
Distance 0Clinch 1Ground 7
JudgesNo per-round card for this bout in our decisions source — the judges’ totals are in the scorecards section below.

Significant strikes, takedowns, control time, knockdowns and submission attempts exactly as UFCStats recorded them for this bout, round by round. Zone percentages are that round’s landed head, body and leg counts over their own total — raw arithmetic, nothing modelled or smoothed. A round in which a fighter landed nothing shades empty and reads zero; it is never filled in from the round before.

Judges’ scorecards

The judges’ totals, the media’s cards beside them, and how these judges usually score.

Official card

Unanimous Decision

Referee · Dan Miragliotta
Official totals — James Wilks first
JudgeTotal
Howard Hughes2.0 avg spread · 43% wide27–30
Chris Lee2.0 avg spread · 44% wide27–30
Andy Roberts1.9 avg spread · 44% wide27–30

There is no per-round card for this bout in our decisions source, so the judges’ totals are all we can show. This one is inside the window our source covers — it is a gap in the record, not a scrape we are waiting on, and nothing here is estimated to fill it.

Media cards — 4 scored, James Wilks first · unofficial

MM AJunkie.com27–30
Tim Leidecker Sherdog.com27–30
Tomasz Marciniak Sherdog.com27–30
Wojslaw Rysiewski Sherdog.com27–30

Fan vote · unofficial

30-27 Patrick · 100%

6 fan cards submitted to MMA Decisions.

Official cards come from the UFCStats fight record and MMA Decisions. Media cards and the fan vote are MMA Decisions’ own collection and are not official. Judge tendency figures are that judge’s whole recorded history, not this bout — they are context for how a card was scored, never a claim that it was scored wrongly.

Takedowns

Takedowns

The level change — head to head

Career UFC takedown rates. Red corner left, blue corner right.

James Wilks

1.27takedowns / 15 min
1.27 / 15m
TAKEDOWNS
2.32 / 15m
5.77 / 15m
ATTEMPTS
4.38 / 15m
22%
ACCURACY
53%
3.80 / 15m
SUB ATT
1.70 / 15m

Claude Patrick

2.32takedowns / 15 min

Career UFC takedown rates exactly as UFCStats publishes them: takedowns landed per 15 minutes, completion rate, submission attempts per 15 minutes, and the share of takedowns tried on them that they stuffed. Attempts per 15 is the one derived figure — landed ÷ completion rate — and it is omitted wherever either input is missing. UFCStats writes 0% where no attempt was recorded at all, so a percentage of exactly zero reads “n/a” here rather than as a measured rate. “Field” is the average fighter in that weight class, or across every division where a class is too small to average. Rate bars run to the population’s 95th percentile (4.97 takedowns / 15m); a fighter above it pins the bar. Percentages are drawn on their own axis.

Ranked in Welterweight

The market story

Where the price started and where it finished — the sportsbook consensus, with the vig removed. We captured no price series for this bout, so there is no chart to draw.

James Wilks↑ +1.9pp
open 37.7%close 39.6%
Claude Patrick↓ −1.9pp
open 62.3%close 60.4%
0%50%100%
OpenClosing consensus (BFO, vig removed)

James Wilks opened at 37.7% and closed at 39.6% (+1.9pp), with Claude Patrick moving the other way by the same amount — the two are one de-vigged pair, so they always sum to 100%. There is no line between those two points because nobody recorded one: we hold the open and the close for this bout, not the days in between.

Show the numbers
CornerOpen (US)Close (US)Open %Close %Move
James Wilks15514537.7%39.6%+1.9pp
Claude Patrick-185-16562.3%60.4%−1.9pp
Opening and closing moneylines from BestFightOdds (data/refs/bfo_fighter_moneylines.csv), one row per fighter per bout, de-vigged pairwise so the two corners sum to 100% · scraped 2026-06-10. No price series was captured for this bout, so no line is drawn between the two points.
← Every fighter on the record